The anachronistic futurist
It’s no secret that people studied under, and often imitated, Leonardo Da Vinci. In this case, though, there is something more significant going on. 
As far as the major art historians can tell, this newly discovered ‘copy’ of the Mona Lisa was painted at the same time as the original by one of Leonardo’s star pupils. At this point the identity of the hand in question is still up in the air, but *top men* are working round the clock to figure out who painted this 500 year old painting. 
It’s interesting to me to see how much of a difference not being considered one of the most important paintings of all time has on preservation efforts. This ‘copy’ is as old as the original. It hasn’t really been well cared for (for 200+ years most of the painting was covered in black lacquer) but, thanks to the fact that it wasn’t a terribly important painting, it hasn’t been ruined by state-of-the-art-in-1850 ‘restoration’ techniques. Because no one was horrified at the thought of losing this painting we haven’t lost it. 
In the beginning, they both had eyebrows; they both had a twinkle in their eyes. In all likelihood, they both had on red dresses. Think about that. 
Look at the two of them side by side. If you didn’t know anything else about the works, at a distance at least, which would you consider to be superior?  
Read more from The Art Newspaper and Time Magazine. 

It’s no secret that people studied under, and often imitated, Leonardo Da Vinci. In this case, though, there is something more significant going on. 

As far as the major art historians can tell, this newly discovered ‘copy’ of the Mona Lisa was painted at the same time as the original by one of Leonardo’s star pupils. At this point the identity of the hand in question is still up in the air, but *top men* are working round the clock to figure out who painted this 500 year old painting. 

It’s interesting to me to see how much of a difference not being considered one of the most important paintings of all time has on preservation efforts. This ‘copy’ is as old as the original. It hasn’t really been well cared for (for 200+ years most of the painting was covered in black lacquer) but, thanks to the fact that it wasn’t a terribly important painting, it hasn’t been ruined by state-of-the-art-in-1850 ‘restoration’ techniques. Because no one was horrified at the thought of losing this painting we haven’t lost it.

In the beginning, they both had eyebrows; they both had a twinkle in their eyes. In all likelihood, they both had on red dresses. Think about that. 

Look at the two of them side by side. If you didn’t know anything else about the works, at a distance at least, which would you consider to be superior?  

Read more from The Art Newspaper and Time Magazine

  1. anderson-criss reblogged this from thisisajunkdrawer
  2. thisisajunkdrawer reblogged this from hobosapien
  3. hamncheezr reblogged this from mynameisarrakis and added:
    Mona Lisa, the 2nd
  4. mynameisarrakis reblogged this from allielujah
  5. allielujah reblogged this from shizukashizuku
  6. shizukashizuku reblogged this from rohnathon
  7. rohnathon reblogged this from rockybelle
  8. rockybelle reblogged this from ajroach42
  9. w-o-a-h-mona-lisa reblogged this from cut-the-laces-of-life
  10. hobosapien reblogged this from ajroach42
  11. mandonna37 reblogged this from lolcanoz
  12. princesalisilda reblogged this from everyoneloves-me
  13. cut-the-laces-of-life reblogged this from ajroach42
  14. everyoneloves-me reblogged this from ajroach42
  15. schizoidblues reblogged this from ajroach42 and added:
    “The most mysterious painting in...history of European
  16. davincioggi reblogged this from ajroach42
  17. lolcanoz reblogged this from ajroach42
  18. janeyfuu reblogged this from butchlesbian
  19. butchlesbian reblogged this from ajroach42
  20. ajroach42 posted this